Friday, October 28, 2005

Spelling put into perspective....

I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdgnieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

Amzanig huh?

Tlod you taht sellping croreclty was bnuk....

6 Comments:

At 10:00 PM, Blogger neophyte said...

Knowing my amazing typoing abilities, this is a very good thing.

 
At 12:50 AM, Anonymous insomniac said...

Let's see...

To be or not to be taht is the qsiouten....

anzaimg!

 
At 6:01 AM, Anonymous insomniac said...

context is needed for pairs like 'trap' and 'tarp', 'grab' and 'garb', though...

 
At 10:54 AM, Anonymous Bismuth said...

The Chinese have got it right... one word, one character (approximately)

 
At 6:24 AM, Blogger Mike Weasel said...

Yeah, but can you imagine how big their keyboards must be?

 
At 7:06 AM, Blogger Leetie said...

wsywiyg, taht is vrey cool!

-Leteie

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home