Spelling put into perspective....
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdgnieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
Amzanig huh?
Tlod you taht sellping croreclty was bnuk....
posted by wysiwyg @ 5:09 PM
5 comments
5 Comments:
Let's see...
To be or not to be taht is the qsiouten....
anzaimg!
context is needed for pairs like 'trap' and 'tarp', 'grab' and 'garb', though...
The Chinese have got it right... one word, one character (approximately)
Yeah, but can you imagine how big their keyboards must be?
wsywiyg, taht is vrey cool!
-Leteie
Post a Comment
<< Home